PM Lee: Complete loss of perspective at Singapore Perspectives Forum

January 26, 2010 by
Filed under: Current Affairs and Politics 

Written by Ng E-Jay
26 January 2010

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong spoke at length at the Singapore Perspectives Forum on Monday from issues ranging from the elections to immigration, but if media reports are anything to go by, he and the PAP have completely lost their perspective on national issues.

Referring to recent mainstream media reports on ex-government scholars joining opposition parties, Mr Lee said that election candidates should not be judged by their academic abilities but by what they can do for Singapore. (CNA, “Candidates should be judged on what they can do for S’pore: PM Lee“, 25 Jan 2010.)

In Mr Lee’s own words as quoted by CNA: “I can tell you, we interview many scholars and each time we field a few of them. And we interview other people too and we often field people who are not scholars. It is good to see it in perspective.

Reading between the lines, is PM Lee implying that scholars who join opposition parties are PAP-rejects?

First and foremost, academically well-qualified people including scholarship recipients joining the ranks of the opposition is nothing new, particularly in recent years. It is only due to the fact that the mainstream media has consistently blacked out news of academically qualified Singaporeans joining opposition parties that the public has come away with the impression that this is a brand new phenomenon.

Ex-scholars Tony Tan and his wife Hazel Poa joined the Worker’s Party several months ago but recently hopped over to the Reform Party. When alternative media like The Online Citizen highlighted this, the mainstream media had no choice but to play catch up.

Secondly, if we are to judge candidates by what they can do for Singapore, then certainly more opposition candidates should be voted in regardless of their academic credentials.

Without political plurality and adequate representation of true dissenting voices in Parliament, the PAP will always monopolize political discourse in Singapore and have the ability to bulldoze their policies through regardless of whether they are truly beneficial for Singaporeans. Opposition candidates are sorely needed in Parliament to balance Singaporeans’ interests against the self-interest of the ruling clique.

In his speech, Mr Lee suggested that academic qualifications are by no means a decisive indicator of whether a given candidate will be a good one.

While hardly anyone would disagree with this, Mr Lee’s statement is also highly ironic, because in the past, the PAP has always highlighted the paper qualifications of its candidates and used that to downplay opposition candidates whom they deride as uneducated individuals.

In fact, even though the current batch of PAP MPs are well qualified academically, many of them are nothing but yes men and women who do not truly serve the interests of Singaporeans but who serve merely to legitimize the executive decisions of the PAP cabinet.

I would go so far as to add that academic credentials are almost completely irrelevant to being a good politician as we have repeatedly seen individuals seemingly armed to the teeth with paper qualifications and scholarships turn out to be duds with poor character and a wrong value system.

Hence, just as we should not get excited over the complete non-event of a couple of ex-scholars joining opposition parties, we should also not be deceived by the facade of false intellectual superiority continually dished out by the PAP in its attempt at brainwashing the masses that it is the only game in town.


Productivity and “Growth at all Costs”

Amazingly, when Mr Lee spoke about economic issues, he said that Singapore will henceforth adopt a new economic growth strategy focused more on improving productivity rather than pursuing growth at all costs. (ST, “Grow productivity, not just GDP: PM“, 26 Jan 2010.)

He said: “Our own population is growing slowly, and we cannot indefinitely expand our workforce by importing more and more workers from abroad.” He also said that Singapore has to shift to growing qualitatively not just by expansion, but by upgrading.

It is precisely the PAP’s “growth at all cost” model of economic management that has led Singapore down the path it is today, as I’ve repeatedly highlighted on this blog.

And it is precisely the PAP’s overly liberal foreign manpower policy and the utterly indiscriminate import of foreign workers with no special talents that have not only caused considerable hardship to lower income Singaporeans, but have also led to declining productivity over the past decade.

The PAP in recent years has shored up GDP and population growth simply by rapidly expanding the ranks of foreigners, with very little attention paid to whether they really bring in skills sets that Singaporeans lack, and with scant regard for the fact that this model of population and economic management is unsustainable, and if left unchecked, will result in a colossal bust somewhere down the road.

It remains to be seen whether PM Lee will walk the talk and do away with our growth at all cost strategy that benefits the wealthy and the elite but leaves heartlanders and working class citizens out of the economic equation.

After all, so many of our GLCs depend on the ability to exploit cheap labour, both local and foreign, to maintain their bottom lines.

The complete lack of accountability of the Government to the economic well-being of Singapore citizens is truly sobering.

And that brings us back full circle to why we need political plurality and why there is an urgent need to hasten the democratization of Singapore, led not by people armed just with glossy pieces of paper credentials, but by people with the right values and mindsets, who are willing to uphold the tenets of democracy at all times.


6 Comments on PM Lee: Complete loss of perspective at Singapore Perspectives Forum

    […] to Election – PM Lee: Complete loss of perspective at Singapore Perspectives Forum – The Temasek Review: PM Lee now says degrees “not as important” after former govt scholars […]

  1. Anthony on Tue, 26th Jan 2010 6:21 pm
  2. I trust PAP wants Singaporeans to do well as well but unfortunately their overriding priority seems to be GDP growth. They had obviously tried to achieve it by importing foreigners at all levels. The end result was erosion in quality of life for many Singaporeans. Why did they do that? The only reason that is obvious to me is that their pay is tied to GDP growth. I have no respect for people who enrich themselves at the expense of others.

  3. George on Tue, 26th Jan 2010 7:47 pm
  4. The opposition should use what he said to haunt his party during the GE rallies. Once again what he said underscored the well known propensity of the govt politicians to say what suit them at the moment WITHOUT any forethought/afterthought about what their own position or statements had been before. To take what they say at face value is to insult ourselves.

    Of course it is nothing new given that the founding father himself had set the example in what he had said in the past while struggling to gain power and what he is saying now to justify his repressive actions.

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ng E-Jay, singapore news. singapore news said: PM Lee: Complete Loss Of Perspective At Singapore Perspectives Forum: Ng E-Jay, Sgpolitics.netTweet […]

  5. Den on Wed, 27th Jan 2010 4:54 am
  6. Singaporeans are a pragmatic lot. What is stopping the flow of babies? Married couple needs a roof, but the roof is not affordable. Even if it is affordable, they may have to top it up with cash. The roof becomes the ‘baby’ because you need to support it at all cost. How to have another baby? I think the government needs to package a deal for married couples that includes higher housing subsidy and pro-family. First, married couples are guaranteed a BTO apartment with much higher subsidy. Each time a child is born, the couple can get further housing subsidy which will help them manage the finances thus reducing their debt.

    Our current housing prices are not helping couples to think about making babies. The roof itself is a money sucking baby that you cannot deny its long term foothold on the paying couple.

    This is just one aspect. A full package can have more benefits.

    […] to Election – Gerald Giam’s Blog: Why I joined the Opposition [Recommended] – PM Lee: Complete loss of perspective at Singapore Perspectives Forum – The Temasek Review: PM Lee now says degrees “not as important” after former govt scholars […]

Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!