Why go after the bottled water industry with pitchforks?

May 15, 2015 by · 1 Comment
Filed under: Current Affairs and Politics 

bottled

Written by Ng E-Jay
15 May 2015

I do NOT understand why people would go after the bottled water industry with pitchforks when the soft drink industry causes far more environmental damage, and markets a far more unhealthy product. The soft drink industry also liberally uses plastics, non-biodegradable containers, and other environmentally-unfriendly agents. They also draw water from drought-affected areas for their own selfish use. Why condemn bottled water and leave soft drinks alone? It makes no sense.

The environmentalists would have me drink a can of coke rather than a can of plain water after a workout. And they always say I can go drink from water fountains or bring my own water bottle. Well I don’t trust public water fountains because of hygiene, and even if I did trust them, I don’t see the government providing water dispensers all throughout the island for people to use.

There was once, on a very hot day, when I was stuck at Upper Thomson Road with no source of hydration except for a seven-eleven store. Imagine if the environmentalists had succeeded in banning bottled water in Singapore. To quench my thirst, I would have to buy a soft drink from the seven-eleven store. What a joke!

The bottled water industry is under attack because of a group of environmentalists who are on the payroll of the soft drink industry to undermine and discredit a simple, perfectly healthy, calorie free product. It is as simple as that. Shame on you, California, for banning a healthy product whilst ignoring the slew of unhealthy beverages being forced down the throats of the general public.

Shame on you, you hypocritical environmentalists.